Gemini Notebook as a
research collaborator

Grounded AI for literature reviews and meeting notes. It only ever answers from the sources you give it.

The problem

Same bottleneck, different fields

Immunology, cancer biology, infectious disease. Different questions, same two problems.

Too much to read

More papers than any of us has time to read, in every subfield.

Reference managers store. They don't think.

Zotero, Mendeley and EndNote organise your library. They don't help you interrogate it.

Meeting notes go missing

Supervision and collaboration meetings fade into memory, or into scattered voice memos.

One tool, two gaps

Gemini Notebook has become how I close both. It's not a replacement for reading. It's a way to question a curated set of sources.

The basics

What it is

A Google tool, built on Gemini, that answers only from the sources you upload into a notebook. Ask questions in plain language and it retrieves the relevant passages before answering (retrieval-augmented generation, or RAG).

Sources

PDFs · audio · video · docs

Upload what you trust. Caps scale with plan.

Gemini Notebook

Retrieves the relevant passages

Not the open internet. Not its training data.

Answer

With inline citations

Every claim traceable back to a source.

Recently renamed. Google renamed NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook on 16 July 2026. Same product, same notebooks, same links. notebooklm.google.com still works.

What you get for free, and what you don't

Plans

Comparison of Gemini Notebook plans: free, Plus, Pro and Ultra, showing usage limits, model access, new-feature access and source caps.

Source caps per notebook: 50 (free) · 100 (Plus) · 300 (Pro) · 600 (Ultra). Screenshot taken 28/07/2026.

The obvious objection

Does it hallucinate?

Why the risk drops

Every claim comes with an inline citation to the exact passage and source it used.

It's restricted to your uploaded sources rather than the open web or training data, so hallucination risk drops sharply versus a general chatbot.

Still on you

It can't tell a good source from a bad one. A flawed or biased paper gets reflected back faithfully.

Grounded ≠ correct. It's only as good as what you feed it, so click through the citations for anything you'll rely on.

Philosoraptor meme: if A.I. hallucinations are bad, are human hallucinations good?
What I use it for, 1 of 2

A curated, queryable literature corpus

Zotero · Mendeley · EndNote

Store and organise references.

+

Gemini Notebook

Ask questions across them, grounded in the text.

How I use it

Prompts worth stealing

What do these sources agree and disagree on?
What methods have been used to measure X?
What hasn't been shown yet?
What I use it for, 2 of 2

Meetings you can query later

Record

Voice memo on your phone during the meeting.

Drag in

Drop the audio file straight into a notebook.

Ask

Decisions, action items and topics, weeks later.

Confidential material: check what's appropriate to upload before you record sensitive conversations. More under Where to be careful.

Live demo

Gut microbiome & cancer immunotherapy

A cross-cutting topic, on purpose.

Immunology

+

Cancer biology

+

Infectious disease

A handful of real papers are loaded into a notebook ahead of time. The full reference list is in the appendix. I'll ask a couple of questions live and we'll look at where the citations land.

Rebuilding this notebook yourself takes about five minutes with the appendix list.

Live demo

Questions we'll test live

Two on the day. Hover any block to copy it.

Which bacterial genera are most consistently linked to response to
immune checkpoint inhibitors across these papers?
Do the sources agree on whether antibiotics before immunotherapy
hurt outcomes? Where do they disagree?

More to try in your own time

What's the proposed mechanism linking gut bacteria to anti-tumour immunity?

Summarise the evidence on faecal microbiota transplantation for overcoming
checkpoint-inhibitor resistance. Cite each claim.

Based only on these sources, what's still unresolved in this field?
Read this before you rely on it

Where to be careful

Data & privacy. Uploaded sources go to Google's servers under your Google account. Before uploading, check what's appropriate for unpublished data, patient information, or confidential meeting content, and check your institution's data-handling guidance.

Getting started

Try it this week

Free to start

notebooklm.google.com, with any Google account.

Start small

One notebook, 8–12 well-chosen sources. Not everything you own.

Explore Studio

Audio overviews, mind maps and briefing docs, all generated from your sources.

Pick a first project

Your next meeting recording, or the reading list for a talk you're prepping.

That's it

Take this further

Presenting in this series yourself? Slots are bookable through the ECR Skill Swap Bookings page. Short and practical beats polished and long.

Appendix

Demo source list

The six papers loaded into the demo notebook. Retrieved via PubMed.

← → navigate  ·  f fullscreen  ·  r reference mode  ·  p print / PDF